IATF 16949 · Core Tools · VDA 6.3
IATF 16949 software with PPAP, APQP + core tools evidenced — control plans, LPA, and customer-specific requirements.
Automotive supplier QMS under IATF 16949:2016 — APQP phases, PPAP submissions (Level 1–5), PFMEA/DFMEA, MSA, SPC, control plans, and layered process audits — all connected to the part, the process and the customer-specific requirement. Written for Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers tired of failing customer audits on evidence that lives in Excel.
PPAP submission builder
PFMEA / DFMEA (AIAG-VDA)
Layered process audits
Customer-specific requirements
Full product detailCommon problems, what's included, why teams choose it, and where commercial meets regulated.
You're shopping because the OEM's SQA just wrote you up on a PPAP with a stale PFMEA.
PPAP packages are re-assembled by hand from folders that don't agree
PFMEA lives in Excel — no revision link to the control plan or work instructions
Customer-specific requirements (Ford, GM, Stellantis, VW) live in an email chain
MSA and SPC data are in the gauge lab, not tied to the part release
8D responses to customer complaints take weeks and repeat root causes
IATF 16949, wired to the part and the plant.
PPAP submission builder
Level 1–5 PPAP packages assembled from the live PFMEA, control plan, MSA, capability study, PSW and appearance approval — versioned per customer, per part, per revision.
PFMEA / DFMEA (AIAG-VDA)
AIAG-VDA harmonized FMEA — structure, function, failure, action priority — linked to control plan characteristics and to the work-instruction step. One revision, one truth.
Layered process audits
LPA schedules by role (operator, supervisor, plant manager, exec). Roll-ups by plant, product line, customer.
Customer-specific requirements
CSRs from Ford (Q1), GM (BIQS), Stellantis (SQ.01), VW (Formel Q) modeled as configurable overlays — one QMS, many customer lenses.
What changes when IATF 16949 is one live system.
- PPAP re-submission for an ECN drops from days to hours
- PFMEA-to-control-plan-to-work-instruction alignment survives customer audit
- LPA compliance rate is a real-time chart, not a monthly recount
- 8D responses to customer complaints close in days with linked root cause
- Customer-specific requirements are versioned and evidenced, not tribal
- IATF surveillance audit findings on documentation trend to zero
Every framework an automotive QA director owns.
IATF 16949:2016
Automotive QMS requirements built on ISO 9001:2015 with sector-specific clauses on product safety, contingency planning, embedded software, and manufacturing feasibility — all modeled and evidenced.
AIAG core tools
APQP, PPAP, FMEA (AIAG-VDA), MSA, SPC — modeled with live links between artifacts. Not five disconnected Excel workbooks.
Customer-specific requirements
Ford Q1, GM BIQS, Stellantis SQ.01, VW Formel Q, Toyota TS and comparable OEM overlays configured per customer without forking the QMS.
VDA 6.3 / VDA 6.5
For suppliers into European OEMs, VDA process audit and product audit evidence generated from the same underlying data — no double record-keeping.
ISO 9001:2015
IATF 16949 is a sector extension of ISO 9001 — the ISO 9001 baseline (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) is native.
IATF 16949 software, answered.
What is IATF 16949 software?
It replaces the Excel-plus-network-folder combination most suppliers inherit.
Does V5 assemble PPAP packages?
Yes. Level 1–5 PPAP packages are assembled from the live PFMEA, control plan, MSA, capability study, PSW, appearance approval and sample submission — versioned per customer, per part, per revision.
Which OEM customer-specific requirements are covered?
Ford Q1, GM BIQS, Stellantis SQ.01, VW Formel Q Konkret, Toyota TS and comparable OEM CSRs are modeled as configurable overlays on the base IATF 16949 QMS. Adding a new OEM customer is a configuration step, not a fork.
How does layered process audit (LPA) work in V5?
LPA schedules are configured by role (operator daily, supervisor weekly, plant manager monthly, executive quarterly) and by product line. Compliance rate rolls up in real time by plant, line and customer program.
Does V5 support VDA 6.3 for European OEMs?
Yes. VDA 6.3 process audit and VDA 6.5 product audit evidence is generated from the same underlying data as the IATF audit — the audit question set is a different lens on the same records, not a parallel system.
How long does implementation take?
Existing PFMEA and control-plan Excel files migrate through a structured import.
Capabilities vary by plan and setup. Confirm specifics with our team before relying on them.
Stop reassembling PPAP by hand. Run IATF 16949 as one live system.
Free trial. Real PPAP + PFMEA + LPA evidence.