V5 Ultimate
Ultimate
PricingResourcesCompany
Start free trial
HomeGlossaryCAPA
Quality · The complete guide

CAPACorrective Action and Preventive Action

In short

CAPA (corrective and preventive action) is the quality-system process for investigating problems, removing their causes and preventing them from happening. Drug guidance (ICH Q10, EU GMP Chapter 1) and device rules (ISO 13485 via FDA's QMSR) each expect it in their own terms.

Sources checked 2026-10-04 · AI editorial check against ICH Q10, EU GMP Chapter 1, 21 CFR 211 and the QMSR final rule; no human expert review recorded
On this page
  1. 01What CAPA is
  2. 02Where the expectation comes from
  3. 03Worked example
  4. 04Common failure modes and checks
  5. 05Where V5 fits
On this page · 5 sections
  1. 1What CAPA is
  2. 2Where the expectation comes from
  3. 3Worked example
  4. 4Common failure modes and checks
  5. 5Where V5 fits
AI · Explain it for MY operation

How does CAPA apply to your shop floor?

Pick your industry and scale — Ask V5 rewrites the definition in your context, gives a worked example, and shows what V5 does on day one.

Your scale

01What CAPA is

A correction fixes the immediate problem (rework a label, quarantine a lot). A corrective action removes the cause so the same problem does not recur. A preventive action removes the cause of a potential problem that has not happened yet. A CAPA system ties these to investigations, records who decided what, and checks afterwards that the actions worked.

ICH Q10 3.2.2 says a pharmaceutical company should have a system for implementing corrective and preventive actions resulting from complaints, product rejections, nonconformances, recalls, deviations, audits, inspections and trends — with investigation effort proportionate to risk, and effectiveness evaluated.

02Where the expectation comes from

Sector / marketSourceStatus
Drugs, US21 CFR 211.192 requires investigation of unexplained discrepancies and failures; 'CAPA' as a system is described in ICH Q10 guidanceRegulation + nonbinding guidance
Drugs, EUEU GMP Chapter 1, 1.4(xiv): root cause analysis and appropriate CAPA, effectiveness monitoredGMP guideline applied through EU law
Devices, USQMSR incorporates ISO 13485:2016 corrective and preventive action clauses; legacy 820.100 no longer currentRegulation (since 2 Feb 2026)

03Worked example

Two complaints in a month report a missing allergen statement on a sauce label. Correction: the affected lots are placed on hold and relabelled after a person approves the disposition. Investigation finds the label template was edited without review. Corrective action: label templates move under change control with a second-person check. Preventive action: the same control is applied to two other product families that use the same template workflow. Effectiveness check: after three months, label audits show no further errors, and the quality lead signs off closure.

04Common failure modes and checks

  • Root cause recorded as 'human error' without checking process, procedure or system causes — EU GMP Chapter 1 asks for that justification.
  • Actions closed on completion, with no effectiveness check.
  • Every issue forced into a full CAPA, burying the important ones; effort should follow risk.
  • CAPA records not linked to the deviation, complaint or audit that raised them.

05Where V5 fits

V5 includes CAPA records with a root-cause workflow, links to deviations, complaints, audits and change control, and electronic signatures. Its Quality AI can suggest a classification or draft text for an investigation; a person reviews, edits and decides. Your procedures set the approval steps, and closing a CAPA or judging effectiveness remains a human decision.

Frequently asked questions

Q.Is CAPA a legal requirement for drug makers in the US?+

21 CFR 211.192 requires investigations of unexplained discrepancies and failures. The term CAPA system comes mainly from ICH Q10, which is guidance.

Q.What is the difference between correction and corrective action?+

A correction fixes the immediate problem; a corrective action removes its cause.

Q.Does every deviation need a CAPA?+

No. Guidance expects effort proportionate to risk; procedures define when a CAPA is opened.

Q.Is 21 CFR 820.100 still the device CAPA rule?+

No. Since 2 February 2026, QMSR relies on ISO 13485:2016's corrective and preventive action clauses.

Primary sources

  • ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (FDA guidance PDF)
  • EudraLex Vol. 4, Chapter 1 — Pharmaceutical Quality System
  • 21 CFR Part 211 (govinfo, CFR 2025 edition)
  • QMSR final rule, 89 FR 7496 (govinfo)

Further reading

  • Deviation
    A common CAPA trigger.
  • Root cause analysis
    The investigation step.
  • Change control
    How CAPA actions get implemented safely.
  • ICH Q10
    The drug quality-system model.
Software that covers CAPA
V5 Ultimate Medical Device MES
Device history records built from signed steps at the workstation: component lots, configured step order, inspections, UDI and…
V5 Ultimate CAPA Software
Root cause, corrective and preventive actions and effectiveness checks sit with the source event, so owners can see what is open…
V5 Ultimate (QMSR)
The FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) — the harmonized replacement for 21 CFR 820 — became effective 2 February…
V5 Ultimate ISO 13485 QMS
Design controls with a live requirements-trace matrix, ISO 14971 risk file linked to software requirements per IEC 62304, CAPA /…

Explore this topic

CAPA sits inside 3 overlapping topic clusters in our glossary. Every neighbour is one click away.

Pharmaceutical GMP
25 related entries

Drug-product cGMP rules, ICH Q-series, and the regulators that enforce them.

21 CFR 21021 CFR 21121 CFR 21221 CFR 58ICH Q7ICH Q9ICH Q10ICH Q2ICH Q6GxPQP releaseConditional releaseDeviationOOSOOTNCRLine ClearanceTech TransferCPVAPIExcipientUSPOEL / OEBCMO / CDMO managementCell & gene therapy manufacturing
Quality tools & investigation
26 related entries

Root-cause toolkit, SPC, capability and the rest of the QA practitioner's bench.

NCRDeviationOOSOOTRoot cause analysis5 Whys8DFMEAFishbone / IshikawaRisk matrixSPCCp / CpkPp / PpkMSAGage R&RAQLRFTFPYYield ReconciliationSMEDOEEAudit managementISO auditCustomer complaintSupplier scorecardSupplier risk management
Blood, tissue & cellular therapies
19 related entries

HCT/Ps, blood cGMP, donor eligibility, ISBT 128 labeling and forward-tracing lookback.

21 CFR 127121 CFR 606HCT/PISBT 128AABB StandardsAATB StandardsLookbackDonor eligibilityBirth tissueCell & gene therapy manufacturingQP releaseConditional releaseDeviationNCRChange controlDocument control21 CFR Part 11Audit trailALCOA+
Talk to us about CAPA

Want to see how CAPA could fit into your own records and workflows? Explore the related V5 pages or talk to our team about what applies to your operation.

Start free
Back to glossary
Inside V5
  • → Audits whose findings reach an owner.
Regulatory anchors
  • 21 CFR 820.100
  • ISO 13485 §8.5.2
Related terms
  • → NCR
  • → Deviation
  • → Routing
  • → 21 CFR 210
  • → 21 CFR 211
  • → 21 CFR 212
  • → 21 CFR 58
  • → ICH Q7
  • → ICH Q9
  • → ICH Q10
  • → ICH Q2
  • → ICH Q6
  • → GxP
  • → QP release
  • → Conditional release
  • → OOS
  • → OOT

Next step

Try V5 with your own records, or ask a question first. Ask V5 opens with an editable question; nothing is sent until you choose to.

Start your free trial Browse all features
V5 Ultimate
Ultimate

Warehouse, quality and manufacturing software for regulated operations.

ProductIndustriesPricingResourcesSecurity & TrustCompanyLegal centre

© V5 Ultimate