V5 Ultimate
Ultimate
PricingResourcesCompany
Start free trial
HomeGlossaryFFC
Compliance

FFC

Foods with Function Claims (機能性表示食品) · foods with function claims · kinosei hyoji shokuhin · 機能性表示食品

In short

Japan's CAA-notified food-with-function-claim regime — self-substantiated function claims without pre-market approval, distinct from FOSHU and Foods with Nutrient Function Claims.

Foods with Function Claims (機能性表示食品, kinosei hyoji shokuhin — FFC) is the Japanese functional-food category introduced in April 2015 by the Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) under the Food Labeling Act. Unlike Foods for Specified Health Use (FOSHU / Tokuho — 特定保健用食品), FFC requires no pre-market government review of efficacy. The operator (manufacturer or seller) self-substantiates the function claim with a published systematic review or its own clinical trial, files a pre-marketing notification with the CAA at least 60 days before sale, and the notification is published on the CAA database. The CAA can challenge the substantiation post-market.

FFC sits inside a three-track Japanese functional food framework. (1) FOSHU / Tokuho — pre-market government efficacy review, the most rigorous and now the slowest-growing track. (2) Foods with Nutrient Function Claims (栄養機能食品, eiyou kinosei shokuhin) — claims from a CAA-published list of 20 vitamins and 5 minerals, no notification needed but only allowed claims permitted. (3) FFC — self-substantiated claims with notification but no review, by far the fastest-growing track since 2015 and the route most international supplement brands take to enter the Japanese functional channel. FFC has been extended beyond processed foods to fresh foods and supplement-format products.

The 2024 red yeast rice (紅麹) incident prompted the CAA to tighten post-market surveillance and GMP expectations on FFC; the pre-market mechanics did not change, but the bar on adverse event reporting and on the quality system behind the notification rose, particularly for supplement-format FFC. In V5 the FFC notification ID, the systematic review or clinical trial substantiation, the GMP attestation, and the Japanese-language label with mandatory disclaimers all live on the SKU's Japan regulatory record, so a CAA post-market query or an adverse event report has its substantiation and batch context on one page.

Regulatory anchors
  • Japan Food Labeling Act (2013)
  • CAA FFC Guidelines (2015, revised 2024)
Where this term comes up
Dietary Supplements
How V5 handles it
Document control — one version in force, every change signed and explained.
Draft the next revision while the current one stays in use, approve it under your sign-off route, and track training on it — with the history kept.
QMS — quality records next to the work they concern.
Deviations, corrective actions and quality review sit in the same system as production, so each quality record references the work order, step and lot it concerns.
Related terms
Blue HatAUST LNPN
Exploring software for this?

Try V5 free for 7 days with no card needed, or talk to our team about what applies to your operation.

Start free
Back to glossary

Next step

Try V5 with your own records, or ask a question first. Ask V5 opens with an editable question; nothing is sent until you choose to.

Start your free trial Browse all features
V5 Ultimate
Ultimate

Warehouse, quality and manufacturing software for regulated operations.

ProductIndustriesPricingResourcesSecurity & TrustCompanyLegal centre

© V5 Ultimate