V5 Ultimate
Compliance

US State EPR

US State Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging · California SB 54 · Oregon PPRMA · Colorado HB22-1355 · Circular Action Alliance · CAA

TL;DR

Seven-state US packaging EPR footprint (California SB 54, Oregon PPRMA, Colorado HB22-1355, Maine LD 1541, Maryland SB 901, Minnesota SF 3561, Washington SB 5284) with Circular Action Alliance as dominant PRO, requiring producer registration, packaging mass/material reporting per SKU and recyclability/recycled-content fee modulation through 2032.

US state Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging is the rapidly expanding state-level regulatory framework requiring producers (entities controlling packaging design and placing packaging into state markets) to register with a Producer Responsibility Organisation, report packaging mass and material per SKU per period, and pay per-unit fees modulated by recyclability and recycled-content. Circular Action Alliance (CAA) is the designated PRO in California, Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington, providing a unified reporting interface across multiple states. California SB 54 (2022, operational 2027-2032) is the most comprehensive with 25% plastic source reduction, 65% recycling rate and 100% recyclable/compostable by 2032 plus $500M producer-funded plastic pollution mitigation. Oregon SB 582 (2021, operational July 2025) covers packaging, printed paper and food serviceware with truth-in-labelling alignment to the DEQ acceptability list. Colorado HB22-1355 (2022, operational January 2026) introduces eco-modulation rewarding lightweighting, recycled-content and recyclability. Maine LD 1541 (2021, state-administered model) is delayed to 2027+. Washington SB 5284 (2025) phases in 2026-2028. Minnesota SF 3561 (2024) registration from July 2025, full programme by 2029. Maryland SB 901 (2025) with CAA designated. The 'DTC exemption' assumption is wrong — direct-to-consumer e-commerce brands selling into these states are producers under each state's EPR law regardless of physical presence. State-specific labelling requirements (California SB 343 limitation on 'recyclable' claim to materials accepted in state systems, Oregon Truth in Labelling) diverge from FTC Green Guides and require per-state artwork compliance. Defensible programmes maintain a unified packaging master per SKU with mass and material per component captured at the artwork-control gate, feeding CAA periodic reporting from a single source of truth.

Regulatory anchors
  • California SB 54
  • Oregon SB 582
  • Colorado HB22-1355
  • Maine LD 1541
  • Washington SB 5284
  • Minnesota SF 3561
Want to see US State EPR in V5?

Free trial, no credit card, onboard in days, not months.