Modern Slavery Act 2015 §54 (TISC)
UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 Section 54 — Transparency in Supply Chains · MSA §54 · transparency in supply chains · TISC statement · slavery and human trafficking statement
Term — Section 54 of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 (transparency in supply chains): uK Modern Slavery Act 2015 §54 — every commercial organisation supplying goods/services, carrying on business in the UK, with global total turnover ≥£36M must publish an annual slavery-and-human-trafficking statement; six recommended areas (organisation structure and supply chains, policies, due-diligence processes, risk assessment and high-risk areas, effectiveness measures and KPIs, training); board approval and director signature required; published on UK homepage and submitted to Home Office modern slavery statement registry; six-month publication deadline from financial-year end; thin or boilerplate statements attract NGO, media, and procurement scrutiny.
Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 creates the UK transparency-in-supply-chains (TISC) obligation. Scope — commercial organisations (bodies corporate or partnerships) supplying goods or services, carrying on a business or part of a business in the UK, with global total annual turnover (parent + subsidiaries) ≥£36M; group structures may publish a single group statement naming every covered entity; non-UK parent with UK trading entity meeting the global turnover test is in scope. Public sector — public-sector organisations brought into scope under 2023 government update where meeting equivalent thresholds. Statement content — §54(5) lists six 'may include' areas treated as expected by 2017 statutory guidance and 2023 updated guidance: (1) organisation structure, business, and supply chains (Tier 1, named Tier 2+ where material, geographic and sector footprint); (2) policies on slavery and human trafficking; (3) due-diligence processes (supplier onboarding screen, ongoing audit, geographic and sector risk weighting, remediation triggers); (4) risk assessment with high-risk areas explicitly identified (sectors: agriculture, garments, construction, electronics, fishing; geographies: ITUC Global Rights Index high-risk countries; labour types: migrant, agency, seasonal); (5) effectiveness measures and KPIs (supplier audit count and findings, training completion, grievance cases received and resolved, remediation funded); (6) training (board, procurement team, supplier-facing staff, supply-chain workers where reach permits). Board approval and signature — statement approved by board (or equivalent governing body) and signed by a director (designated LLP member, general partner) with wet or qualified electronic signature; board approval minute is the evidence. Publication — prominent link on UK homepage (footer acceptable); submission to Home Office modern slavery statement registry at gov.uk/modern-slavery-statement-registry; both required. Deadline — six months from financial-year end is the government expectation. Common failure patterns NGOs flag — boilerplate copy-pasted year over year, due-diligence claims without described methodology, zero-indicators claims across global Tier-2+ supply chains, missing or wrong-officer signature, registry submission missing. Enforcement — Home Office can apply to High Court for injunction; practical enforcement is reputational (Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, Walk Free Modern Slavery Registry, Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre) and procurement-driven (major customers and public-sector buyers reject suppliers without compliant statements).
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 §54
- Home Office Transparency in Supply Chains Statutory Guidance 2017
- Home Office Updated Guidance 2023
Try V5 free for 7 days with no card needed, or talk to our team about what applies to your operation.