Compliance · The complete guide

MHLW (Japan)

TL;DR

MHLW — Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働省, Kōsei-rōdō-shō) — is Japan's national government ministry responsible for health, social welfare, labour + pensions policy + the legal owner of marketing-authorisation decisions for medicines, medical devices, regenerative-medicine products, cosmetics + quasi-drugs under the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act / 薬機法 / Yakukihō). MHLW was established 6 January 2001 by the merger of the former Ministry of Health and Welfare + the Ministry of Labour. The MHLW Pharmaceutical Safety Bureau (PSB / 医薬局) — restructured + renamed from Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau in 2024 — owns the regulatory framework for therapeutic products. PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency / 医薬品医療機器総合機構) is the MHLW-affiliated Incorporated Administrative Agency that conducts scientific review, GMP / GCP / GVP inspections + safety operations on MHLW's behalf — but MHLW retains formal authority + issues the承認 (shōnin — approval) decision. The MHLW-PMDA relationship is one of policy-owner + scientific-arm: MHLW sets policy via the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act, MHLW Notifications + Ministerial Ordinances + delegates scientific review + most inspection work to PMDA, while MHLW retains legal accountability + handles ICH ratification, international engagement + government-to-government regulatory diplomacy. This page covers MHLW's regulatory architecture — for PMDA's scientific review processes, see the PMDA glossary entry.

Reviewed · By V5 Ultimate compliance team· 3,940 words · ~18 min read

01What MHLW actually is

MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / 厚生労働省, Kōsei-rōdō-shō) is Japan's national government ministry responsible for health policy, social welfare, labour policy + pensions. MHLW was established 6 January 2001 by the merger of the former Ministry of Health and Welfare (1938-2001) + the Ministry of Labour (1947-2001) as part of Japan's 2001 Central Government Reform. MHLW's headquarters is in Kasumigaseki, Tokyo + the ministry employs approximately 33,000 staff across headquarters, regional bureaus + affiliated agencies. The Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (大臣, Daijin) is a Cabinet-level political appointee.

Within MHLW the pharmaceutical regulatory ecosystem includes:

  • Pharmaceutical Safety Bureau (PSB / 医薬局) — restructured + renamed from the Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau (PSEHB) in 2024; owns the legal + regulatory framework for medicines, medical devices, regenerative-medicine products, cosmetics + quasi-drugs.
  • Health Policy Bureau (医政局) — owns broader health-policy framework including medical-practitioner regulation + hospital regulation.
  • Office for Pharmaceutical Industry — within PSB; industrial-policy + industry-engagement function.
  • Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council — MHLW advisory body composed of external experts that advises the Minister on regulatory decisions including marketing authorisations + post-market actions.
  • Subcommittee on New Drugs, Subcommittee on Medical Devices, Subcommittee on Regenerative Medicine — PMDA-supported subcommittees of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council that recommend approval decisions to MHLW.
  • PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) — MHLW-affiliated Incorporated Administrative Agency conducting scientific review + GMP / GCP / GVP inspection + safety operations on MHLW's behalf.
  • National Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS) — MHLW-affiliated national reference laboratory.
  • National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) — MHLW-affiliated national reference laboratory for infectious diseases + vaccines.
  • Prefectural + Municipal Health Departments — sub-national health authorities executing MHLW policy at prefectural + municipal level including pharmacy + drug-wholesale licensing.

Legal foundations are the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act / 薬機法 / Yakukihō, formally the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, Law No. 145 of 1960 as substantially amended in 2014 + subsequent revisions), the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (2014), the Health Insurance Act, the Pharmacists Act + a substantial body of MHLW Ministerial Ordinances + Notifications (告示 + 通知 / Kokuji + Tsūchi) implementing the PMD Act.

MHLW is the founding ICH Regulatory Member (alongside FDA + EMA, 1990), a PIC/S Participating Authority since July 2014 (through PMDA as the operational inspectorate), an IMDRF Management Committee Member, an active ICMRA participant + the lead Japanese government interlocutor for international pharmaceutical + medical-device regulatory diplomacy. MHLW also chairs the Korea-Japan-China Tripartite regulatory cooperation alongside MFDS + NMPA.

02MHLW vs PMDA — policy owner vs scientific arm

Understanding the MHLW-PMDA relationship is essential to working in Japan. The two are legally distinct but operationally inseparable: MHLW sets policy + issues the formal approval; PMDA conducts the scientific review + inspection that supports MHLW's decision. The split mirrors (but is more formal than) the FDA-HHS or EMA-EU Commission relationships.

  • MHLW — legal owner of the PMD Act + the formal authority for 承認 (shōnin — approval) decisions; issues MHLW Ordinances (省令 / Shōrei) + Notifications (告示 / 通知); negotiates international agreements; chairs ICH-MHLW + PIC/S-MHLW representation.
  • PMDA — Incorporated Administrative Agency under MHLW conducting scientific review of NDAs + Medical Device applications + Regenerative Medicine applications + Re-examination + Re-evaluation + Quasi-Drug + Cosmetic notifications + GMP / GCP / GLP / GVP inspections.
  • MHLW issues the formal 承認 decision based on PMDA's review report + the recommendation of the relevant Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council Subcommittee.
  • PMDA conducts overseas GMP inspections under PIC/S MoU with PMDA as the operational inspectorate; inspection findings feed into MHLW's enforcement framework.
  • MHLW handles ICH ratification + Step 4 / Step 5 implementation in Japan; PMDA does the technical drafting + Working Group participation.
  • MHLW handles international government-to-government MoUs + regulatory diplomacy (with FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, TGA, MFDS, NMPA, others); PMDA handles working-level regulator-to-regulator engagement.
  • Both are listed in international fora — MHLW as the political/policy member + PMDA as the operational regulator; this is occasionally a source of external confusion.
  • Pre-2004 — review was conducted by various MHLW-internal bodies + the predecessor OPSR; the modern PMDA was established 1 April 2004 as the unified scientific-review + inspection agency.
  • Post-2014 PMD Act amendment — substantial regulatory modernisation including the regenerative-medicine framework (Class 1 + Class 2 + Class 3), the Conditional + Time-limited Approval pathway + the SAKIGAKE Designation System for pioneer drugs + devices.
  • Post-2024 PSB restructure — Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau renamed + restructured as Pharmaceutical Safety Bureau (PSB), reflecting MHLW's organisational evolution.

03Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act / 薬機法)

The PMD Act (薬機法 / Yakukihō, formally the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, Law No. 145 of 1960) is Japan's foundational pharmaceutical + medical-device + regenerative-medicine + cosmetic + quasi-drug regulatory law. It has been substantially amended over six decades, most importantly:

  • 1979 — Major amendment introducing the modern Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) framework + Re-examination + Re-evaluation systems.
  • 2002 — Amendment introducing the modern medical-device regulatory framework with risk-based classification + QMS requirements.
  • 2005 — Reorganisation creating the modern PMDA + the unified review framework + Re-examination + Re-evaluation reforms.
  • 2014 — Major amendment renaming the law from Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (薬事法 / Yakujihō) to the current Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (薬機法 / Yakukihō); created the regenerative-medicine framework (Class 1 Conditional + Time-limited + Class 2 + Class 3); created the SAKIGAKE Designation System; modernised medical-device + IVD classification + post-market surveillance.
  • 2019 — Amendment strengthening pharmacovigilance + medical-device post-market surveillance + introducing pharmacist-supervised tele-pharmacy.
  • 2022 — Amendment strengthening drug-shortage response + supply-chain transparency requirements + post-pandemic regulatory resilience.

Key structural elements include:

  • Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH / 製造販売業者) — Japanese-resident entity that holds the 承認 + bears post-market liability + pharmacovigilance responsibility; foreign manufacturers must engage a Japanese MAH or establish a Japanese subsidiary.
  • Foreign Special Approval Holder (外国特例承認取得者) — alternative framework allowing certain foreign entities to hold approval directly subject to Japanese in-country agent + MAH-equivalent obligations.
  • Approval (承認 / Shōnin) — the formal MHLW marketing-authorisation decision for medicines + medical devices + regenerative-medicine products requiring substantive review.
  • Notification (届出 / Todokede) — simpler regulatory submission for quasi-drugs + cosmetics + Class I medical devices not requiring full Approval.
  • Three Officers — MHLW Ordinance requires every Japanese MAH to designate three responsible officers: General Marketing Compliance Officer (総括製造販売責任者), Quality Assurance Officer (品質保証責任者) + Safety Management Officer (安全管理責任者).
  • MHLW Ordinance 179 (2004) — Japanese GMP for drugs + quasi-drugs; substantively aligned with PIC/S GMP Guide + ICH Q7 / Q9 / Q10.
  • MHLW Ordinance 169 (2004) — Japanese QMS for medical devices; substantively aligned with ISO 13485:2016.
  • MHLW Notifications + Tsūchi — implementing guidance that operationalises the PMD Act + Ordinances; the principal source of regulatory detail for applicants + sponsors.

04Approval pathways MHLW issues under the PMD Act

PathwayUse caseClock + content
Standard Drug Approval (新薬承認)First-in-Japan new chemical entity / new biological / new indication; full PMDA scientific review + MHLW formal approval.PMDA target review: 12 months from acceptance; Priority Review 9 months; clock excludes applicant clock + agreed timeouts; MHLW formal approval typically 1-2 months after PMDA review completion.
Conditional + Time-limited Approval (条件付き早期承認)Serious + life-threatening conditions with limited treatment options; conditional approval based on Phase II evidence with post-marketing study commitments substantively similar to FDA Accelerated Approval / EMA Conditional MA.Conditional + time-limited approval with mandatory post-marketing study; conversion to standard approval based on confirmatory evidence.
SAKIGAKE Designation + Approval (先駆け審査指定制度)Pioneering drugs + devices + regenerative-medicine products developed first in Japan; Japan-first commitment + breakthrough innovation criteria.Reduced PMDA review: 6 months target; enhanced PMDA + MHLW engagement; introduced by MHLW 2015 + formalised in 2020 PMD Act amendment.
Generic Drug Approval (後発医薬品承認)Generic version of approved reference drug; bioequivalence study at PMDA-recognised centre.PMDA target review: 10 months for new generics; reduced for second + subsequent generics.
Biosimilar Approval (バイオシミラー承認)Biosimilar version of approved reference biological; per MHLW + PMDA biosimilar guidance substantively aligned with EMA + WHO + ICH biosimilar guidance.PMDA target review: 12 months; comparability + clinical pathway.
Regenerative Medicine Class 1 + Class 2 + Class 3 (再生医療等製品)Cell + gene therapies + tissue-engineered products under the 2014 PMD Act regenerative-medicine framework; tiered by risk + treatment context.Class 1 (Conditional + Time-limited): up to 7 years conditional approval based on Phase II evidence; substantially shorter than US / EU equivalents; world's most progressive ATMP framework until Korea + EU caught up.
Medical Device Approval (医療機器承認)Class II + III + IV medical devices via PMDA review + MHLW approval; Class I + certain Class II via simplified notification or third-party certification.PMDA target review: 12 months for new Class III + IV; Class II registered certification body (RCB) pathway typical for many Class II devices.
IVD Approval (体外診断用医薬品承認)In Vitro Diagnostic products under the PMD Act IVD framework; Class I-III risk-based classification with PMDA review for higher-risk products.PMDA target review depending on class; many lower-risk IVDs via notification or RCB pathway.
Re-examination (再審査)Mandatory post-marketing period (typically 4-8 years for new chemical entities, 10 years for orphan + regenerative-medicine products) during which the MAH must conduct prescribed post-marketing studies + submit a re-examination application; MHLW formally re-confirms or modifies approval.Fixed re-examination period set at approval; submission window prescribed by MHLW Notification; final MHLW re-examination decision.
Re-evaluation (再評価)MHLW-initiated periodic reassessment of approved drugs for ongoing safety + efficacy + benefit-risk; can trigger label changes, post-marketing study requirements or, in extreme cases, withdrawal.MHLW-initiated; ad-hoc + cyclical re-evaluation programmes covering classes of approved drugs.

05SAKIGAKE + Conditional Approval — Japan's pioneer + accelerated pathways

MHLW operates two distinctive accelerated-approval pathways that have substantially shaped Japan's standing as a competitive global regulatory venue, particularly for innovative + first-in-class products.

  • SAKIGAKE Designation System (先駆け審査指定制度) — introduced by MHLW Notification in 2015 + formalised in the 2020 PMD Act amendment; provides accelerated PMDA review (6-month target vs 12-month standard) + enhanced PMDA + MHLW engagement for products meeting four criteria: (1) world-first innovation, (2) Japan-first development commitment, (3) substantial improvement over existing therapies + (4) serious-disease focus.
  • SAKIGAKE has been awarded to a select group of drugs + medical devices + regenerative-medicine products since 2015; designation requires substantial pre-submission engagement with PMDA + MHLW + a commitment to file in Japan first or simultaneously with other major regulators.
  • Conditional + Time-limited Approval (条件付き早期承認) — substantively similar to FDA Accelerated Approval + EMA Conditional Marketing Authorisation; approval based on Phase II evidence with mandatory post-marketing confirmatory study + time-limited approval converting to standard approval upon confirmation.
  • Conditional + Time-limited Approval was substantially expanded in the 2014 PMD Act amendment + has been applied to several oncology + rare-disease products.
  • Regenerative Medicine Class 1 Conditional + Time-limited — the 2014 PMD Act regenerative-medicine framework allows up to 7 years of conditional approval for regenerative-medicine products based on Phase II evidence; this was the world's most progressive ATMP framework until Korea's 2019 Advanced Regenerative Bio Act caught up.
  • Orphan Drug Designation (希少疾病用医薬品) — MHLW orphan-drug framework with reduced fees + enhanced PMDA engagement + extended re-examination period (10 years vs 4-8 years standard); applies to drugs for serious diseases affecting fewer than 50,000 patients in Japan.
  • Priority Review (優先審査) — PMDA priority review (9-month target vs 12-month standard) for orphan drugs + drugs for serious unmet need; complementary to but distinct from SAKIGAKE.
  • Pediatric extension + Pediatric Investigation Plan equivalent — MHLW operates a Pediatric Use development framework with extended re-examination + tax incentives.
  • All accelerated pathways operate within the same Marketing Authorization Holder + Three Officers framework — accelerated approval does not relax MAH + post-market obligations.

06MHLW international engagement

  • ICH Founding Regulatory Member — MHLW is one of the three founding ICH Regulatory Members (alongside FDA + EMA, 1990); chairs + co-chairs ICH Working Groups + has co-developed essentially every ICH Guideline; ICH ratification + Step 4 / Step 5 implementation in Japan flows through MHLW.
  • PIC/S Participating Authority since July 2014 (through PMDA as operational inspectorate) — full GMP-inspection reliance with all PIC/S members.
  • IMDRF Management Committee Member — co-founder of GHTF + IMDRF; chair / co-chair rotation; lead on IMDRF Working Groups on UDI, QMS, SaMD + AI / ML.
  • ICMRA Founding Member — active on pandemic preparedness, supply chain, regulatory innovation + reliance.
  • Korea-Japan-China Tripartite — MHLW chairs trilateral regulatory cooperation alongside MFDS + NMPA covering generics, biosimilars, regenerative-medicine + medical devices.
  • APEC Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee (RHSC) — active member contributing on APEC pharmaceutical + medical-device harmonisation.
  • Asia-Pacific reach — MHLW + PMDA have substantial influence across Asia-Pacific through bilateral MoUs (with MFDS, NMPA, TGA, HSA, MFDS, FDA Philippines, TFDA Taiwan + others) + Japanese product approvals are often accepted as reliance evidence by smaller Asian regulators.
  • Bilateral MoUs — MHLW + PMDA hold MoUs with FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, TGA, MFDS, NMPA, SFDA, ANVISA + many others; tight cooperation on inspections + safety + information exchange.
  • WHO collaboration — MHLW supports WHO programmes through PMDA technical contributions + Japanese government funding; not a WHO PQ submitter for Japanese MAs but provides extensive technical assistance to LMIC NRAs.
  • MDSAP Participating Regulator — MHLW + PMDA are MDSAP Participating Regulators with full audit-report reliance.

07Common MHLW / PMD Act issues + missteps

  • MAH not properly established or Three Officers not properly designated — application rejected at PMDA intake or post-approval compliance failure.
  • Foreign Special Approval Holder framework misjudged — applicants attempting to use FSAH where MAH route is required.
  • SAKIGAKE eligibility misjudged — applicants applying for SAKIGAKE without satisfying the Japan-first commitment or world-first innovation criteria.
  • Japanese clinical data requirement misjudged — most new drugs require some Japanese clinical data (Japan-inclusive global trial or Japanese bridging study); foreign-only data rarely sufficient.
  • Re-examination period commitments missed — MAH failing to complete prescribed post-marketing studies within re-examination period; MHLW re-examination decision delayed or unfavourable.
  • Japanese-language labelling + IFU non-compliant — Japanese labelling has specific MHLW-required content including 効能・効果 (indications), 用法・用量 (dosage), 警告 (warning) + 副作用 (adverse reactions).
  • PMDA Consultation strategy not used — applicants failing to engage in pre-submission PMDA Consultations (paid scientific advice) before submission; significantly higher rejection rate.
  • MHLW Ordinance 179 GMP gaps — applicants assuming PIC/S GMP compliance is sufficient without addressing Japanese-specific MHLW Ordinance 179 + Notification requirements.
  • Data integrity findings — backdating, audit-trail disabled, shared logins, uncontrolled spreadsheets used as raw data; PMDA + PIC/S-level expectations apply.
  • Sterile / aseptic process gaps — PMDA inspectorate alignment with EU GMP Annex 1 (2022 revision) creates new expectations + frequent findings.
  • MDSAP audit-report packaging gap — MHLW accepts MDSAP but requires PMDA-specific overlay + non-conformity closures.
  • Regenerative Medicine framework misjudged — Class 1 / 2 / 3 classification + the Conditional + Time-limited approval framework requires substantial MHLW + PMDA engagement.
  • Three Officers responsibility gaps — General Marketing Compliance Officer / Quality Assurance Officer / Safety Management Officer roles not clearly delineated.
  • Japan-EU MRA misunderstood — Japan-EU MRA covers medicines GMP-inspection reliance but not marketing-authorisation reliance; applicants need to file separately in Japan even if EU-approved.
  • PMDA Re-examination + Re-evaluation strategy not planned — MAHs treating re-examination as routine renewal rather than substantive post-marketing benefit-risk reassessment.

08How V5 Ultimate supports MHLW / PMDA readiness

V5 Ultimate provides the operational infrastructure Japanese + foreign-supplier sites need for PMD Act + MHLW Ordinance 179 + Ordinance 169 + MHLW Notifications + PMDA-Tsūchi compliance + MHLW / PMDA readiness.

  • MHLW Ordinance 179 GMP control framework — PIC/S-aligned controls (clean rooms, aseptic process, environmental monitoring, EU GMP Annex 1 2022 alignment, computerised systems) with ALCOA+ data-integrity + PMDA inspectorate alignment + MHLW Ordinance 179 + Notification-specific elements.
  • Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) + Three Officers workflow — General Marketing Compliance Officer / Quality Assurance Officer / Safety Management Officer designation + role-management; Japanese MAH establishment-licence scope management; foreign-manufacturer QMS-evidence packaging.
  • PMDA submission packaging — eCTD-aligned dossier structure with Japanese Module 1 specifics + PMDA Consultation Document packaging + Japanese clinical data integration.
  • SAKIGAKE workflow — Japan-first commitment tracking, world-first innovation evidence packaging, PMDA + MHLW pre-submission consultation management.
  • Conditional + Time-limited Approval workflow — Phase II evidence packaging, post-marketing confirmatory study planning + tracking, conversion-to-standard-approval evidence package.
  • Regenerative Medicine Class 1 / 2 / 3 workflow — Conditional + Time-limited Approval framework (up to 7 years), cell + gene therapy QMS + GCT-Manufacturing Practice, regenerative-medicine clinical-evaluation packaging.
  • Medical Device + IVD registration workflow — Class I-IV classification, MDSAP + ISO 13485 + MHLW Ordinance 169 audit-report packaging, RCB (Registered Certification Body) pathway management for Class II products.
  • Re-examination + Re-evaluation workflow — post-marketing study planning + tracking, re-examination application packaging within MHLW-prescribed window, MAH benefit-risk reassessment.
  • Japanese labelling + IFU — Japanese-language artwork workflow with two-person review + e-signature; MHLW-required elements (効能・効果 / 用法・用量 / 警告 / 副作用) + Three Officers + MAH details.
  • PMDA pharmacovigilance — E2B(R3) ICSR generation, 15-day SUSAR timeline, PSUR / RMP packaging, Safety Management Officer workflow + Japanese Pharmacovigilance Master File.
  • Medical device vigilance — FSCA + FSN reporting per MHLW + PMDA framework + IMDRF alignment.
  • Korea-Japan-China + APAC bridging — for companies operating across Northeast Asia, V5 surfaces MHLW + MFDS + NMPA harmonised dossier-element reuse alongside national-specific extensions.

Frequently asked questions

Q.What's the difference between MHLW + PMDA?+

MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is the Japanese government ministry that owns the legal framework — the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act / 薬機法), MHLW Ministerial Ordinances + MHLW Notifications — + issues the formal 承認 (shōnin — approval) decision for medicines, medical devices + regenerative-medicine products. PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) is the MHLW-affiliated Incorporated Administrative Agency established 2004 that conducts the scientific review, GMP / GCP / GVP inspection + safety operations on MHLW's behalf. Think of MHLW as the policy + legal owner + PMDA as the operational scientific arm; the two are inseparable in practice + applicants engage primarily with PMDA throughout the lifecycle while MHLW retains the formal approval authority + post-market enforcement power.

Q.How long does an MHLW / PMDA drug approval take?+

Standard timelines: PMDA scientific review 12 months from acceptance for new drugs; Priority Review 9 months; SAKIGAKE Designation 6 months; Generic 10 months; Biosimilar 12 months. MHLW formal 承認 issuance typically 1-2 months after PMDA review completion. Actual elapsed time depends on the quality of the dossier + speed of applicant responses to PMDA inquiries + PMDA Consultation engagement before submission. MHLW + PMDA together are among the faster major regulators for innovative drugs, particularly under the SAKIGAKE + Conditional Approval frameworks.

Q.What's a Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) under the PMD Act?+

MAH (Marketing Authorization Holder / 製造販売業者, Seizō-Hanbai-Gyōsha) is the Japanese-resident legal entity that holds the 承認 (shōnin — approval) + bears post-market liability + pharmacovigilance responsibility. Foreign manufacturers must engage a Japanese MAH (typically establishing a Japanese subsidiary or appointing a Japanese contract MAH service) or use the alternative Foreign Special Approval Holder framework with a Japanese in-country agent + equivalent obligations. The MAH must designate three Three Officers: General Marketing Compliance Officer (総括製造販売責任者), Quality Assurance Officer (品質保証責任者) + Safety Management Officer (安全管理責任者). MAH is substantively similar to EU MAH + US Sponsor + Swiss MA holder + UK MA holder.

Q.What's SAKIGAKE Designation?+

SAKIGAKE Designation System (先駆け審査指定制度) is MHLW's pioneer-drug + device + regenerative-medicine accelerated pathway, introduced 2015 + formalised in the 2020 PMD Act amendment. It provides accelerated PMDA review (6-month target vs 12-month standard) + enhanced PMDA + MHLW engagement for products meeting four criteria: world-first innovation, Japan-first development commitment, substantial improvement over existing therapies + serious-disease focus. SAKIGAKE has been awarded to a select group of products since 2015 + is one of the most attractive accelerated pathways globally for companies committed to Japan-first development.

Q.What's Conditional + Time-limited Approval?+

Conditional + Time-limited Approval (条件付き早期承認) is MHLW's serious-disease accelerated pathway, substantively similar to FDA Accelerated Approval + EMA Conditional Marketing Authorisation. Approval is based on Phase II evidence with a mandatory post-marketing confirmatory study; approval is time-limited + converts to standard approval upon confirmation. The framework was substantially expanded in the 2014 PMD Act amendment. For regenerative-medicine products under the PMD Act regenerative-medicine framework, conditional + time-limited approval can extend up to 7 years — the world's most progressive ATMP conditional-approval framework when introduced (Korea's 2019 Advanced Regenerative Bio Act subsequently provided a similar framework).

Q.Does MHLW accept MDSAP for medical devices?+

Yes — MHLW + PMDA are MDSAP Participating Regulators with full audit-report reliance for Japanese medical-device QMS evidence. Manufacturers should provide the full MDSAP audit report + non-conformity closures + a PMDA-specific overlay covering Japanese-specific MHLW Ordinance 169 QMS elements + Japanese MAH + Three Officers + labelling considerations. MDSAP reliance has substantially streamlined medical-device QMS evidence requirements for companies operating across US + Canada + Brazil + Australia + Japan.

Q.Is Japanese clinical data required for MHLW approval?+

Most new drugs require some Japanese clinical data — either via Japan-inclusive global trials (where Japanese sites are included in pivotal Phase III trials with Japanese ethnic-sensitivity assessment), Japanese bridging studies (additional Japanese-only studies to bridge foreign data to Japanese patients) or Japanese de novo trials. MHLW + PMDA have substantially evolved their position on foreign clinical data since the 1998 ICH E5 framework + 2007 Basic Principles on Global Clinical Trials, accepting more foreign data with appropriate Japanese bridging; but pure foreign-only data is still rarely sufficient for new drug approval. PMDA Consultation engagement is essential to plan the right Japanese clinical evidence package.

Primary sources

Further reading

See MHLW (Japan) working on a real shop floor

V5 Ultimate ships with the MHLW (Japan) controls already wired in — audit trail, e-signatures, validation evidence. Free trial, no credit card, onboard in days, not months.