Guide
Natasha's Law and PPDS allergen labelling: the UK compliance stack
Natasha's Law — the Food Information (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2019 and parallel devolved-administration regulations — requires that all food packed on the same premises from which it is sold (Prepacked for Direct Sale, PPDS) carry full ingredient labelling with the 14 FIC allergens emphasised. In force since October 2021 in response to the death of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse from undisclosed sesame in a Pret a Manger baguette. PPDS labelling sits on top of the retained Food Information for Consumers Regulation (FIC, Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 as retained), FSA allergen guidance, and the wider allergen-management chain from supplier specification to recipe management to retail-environment cross-contact controls. FSA enforcement and Trading Standards inspections have been active since 2022.
Start free trial Free trial, no credit card, onboard in days, not months.
PPDS — what counts and what doesn't
Prepacked for Direct Sale is food that is packaged at the same place it is offered to consumers, where the consumer can select the item without further intervention. Examples: sandwiches packed in a deli for chiller display, packaged salads at a cafe, baked items wrapped at a bakery counter, pre-packed lunchbox items at a school canteen. PPDS does NOT cover: food prepared in response to a consumer order (a made-to-order sandwich), food not in packaging (loose bakery items handed over at point of sale), or prepacked food made at a central commissary and shipped to the retail site (that falls under standard FIC prepacked labelling — even stricter). The PPDS boundary is the dominant practical question — FSA published detailed flowcharts and case studies to support classification.
Mandatory PPDS label content
PPDS labels require: (1) the name of the food, (2) the full ingredient list in descending order of weight at the time of use, (3) the 14 FIC allergens emphasised in the ingredient list (bold, italic, underline, contrasting colour or other emphasis — emphasis must be in the ingredient list, not only in a separate allergen statement). The 14 allergens: cereals containing gluten, crustaceans, eggs, fish, peanuts, soybeans, milk, nuts, celery, mustard, sesame seeds, sulphur dioxide and sulphites >10 mg/kg, lupin, molluscs. Compound ingredients require ingredient declaration of sub-components. QUID declaration (Quantitative Ingredient Declaration) applies where an ingredient is featured in the name or visually emphasised. Allergen-statement-only labelling without ingredient emphasis is not compliant.
FIC allergen framework and 'may contain' precautionary labelling
The retained FIC Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 sets the 14-allergen disclosure framework that PPDS extends. Allergens intentionally present (ingredients) must be declared with emphasis. Allergens that may be present through cross-contact ('may contain' / 'made in a facility that') are governed by FSA precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) guidance — PAL must reflect a genuine, unavoidable risk after reasonable cross-contact controls; routine 'may contain everything' labelling is non-compliant and dilutes the meaningful warnings. FSA and FDF have published guidance on risk-assessment-based PAL using VITAL-style reference doses and cross-contact risk evaluation.
Allergen management — supplier specs, recipe control, cross-contact
Compliant PPDS labelling depends on the full allergen-management chain. Supplier specifications must carry allergen status and 'may contain' status on every input. Recipe management must capture every ingredient including processing aids, glazes and oils. Substitution control — temporary supplier change, out-of-stock substitution, line operator decisions — must propagate to label artwork. Cross-contact controls (shared lines, scheduling, cleaning verification, dedicated equipment) must be documented and verified. Front-of-house staff must be trained for allergen handling. BRCGS Issue 9 §5.3 and SALSA module 14 align with the same chain.
Enforcement, recalls and FSA Food Alerts
Trading Standards is the primary local enforcement authority for FIC and Natasha's Law, with FSA coordinating Food Alert for Action (FAFA) and Allergy Alerts. Common enforcement findings since 2022: PPDS items with allergen-statement-only labels (no ingredient emphasis), missing sesame/celery/mustard/sulphite declarations, undeclared milk in 'vegan' SKUs, undeclared gluten in 'gluten-free' SKUs (cross-contact above 20 ppm). Allergy Alerts trigger withdrawal and recall and are published on the FSA website. The Coroner's Prevention of Future Deaths reports in allergen cases have driven legislative and enforcement attention.
Practical readiness — building for Natasha's Law
Classify every SKU as prepacked, PPDS, or loose, with documented basis. Maintain supplier specs with allergen and 'may contain' status, refreshed at requalification. Run recipe management as the source of truth for ingredient list, allergen emphasis and QUID. Run label artwork generation from the recipe — manually-typed labels are the dominant root cause of enforcement findings. Run PAL risk assessments based on actual cross-contact risk, not defensive blanket statements. Train front-of-house and back-of-house staff and refresh annually. Wire substitution control to label re-issue. Maintain a documented allergen-handling procedure for customer queries at point of sale.
Where this lives in V5 Ultimate
The clauses above aren't theoretical — every one maps to a shipped module and an industry profile. Jump to the parts of the product that turn this guide into evidence on a Monday morning.
Modules that do the work
Industries this hits hardest
Frequently asked
Is a 'contains: milk, wheat' statement enough?
No. PPDS requires the full ingredient list with the 14 allergens emphasised in the ingredient list itself (bold, underline or other emphasis). A standalone 'contains' statement without the full ingredient list and without emphasis in the ingredient list is not compliant — and is among the most common enforcement findings.
Does a made-to-order sandwich need a PPDS label?
No — food prepared in direct response to a consumer order is not PPDS. But the business is still required to provide allergen information to consumers on request under FIC for non-prepacked food, and the FSA recommends a documented allergen information system (matrix, app, signage with 'ask staff for allergen information').
Can I label 'may contain nuts' to be safe?
Not without a risk basis. Precautionary allergen labelling should reflect a genuine, unavoidable cross-contact risk after reasonable controls. Blanket 'may contain everything' labelling is non-compliant per FSA guidance and dilutes meaningful warnings. Do a documented PAL risk assessment per SKU per allergen.
Do the same rules apply in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?
Yes — parallel devolved-administration regulations apply: the Food Information (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2019, the Food Information (Amendment) (Scotland) Regulations 2020, and the Food Information (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020. Northern Ireland additionally operates under the EU FIC post-Windsor Framework for food labelling, with subtle divergence from GB. Build for the GB+NI matrix.
See it on your shop floor.
Free trial, no credit card, onboard in days, not months.
Related reading
- 10 CFR 35 medical use readiness — NRC licensing for radiopharmaceuticals
- 21 CFR 111 Readiness: Dietary Supplement cGMP Subparts E & F
- 21 CFR 211 Drug cGMP Readiness Guide
- 21 CFR 212 PET drug cGMP readiness — FDA inspection playbook
- 21 CFR 589 BSE / Ruminant Feed Ban Readiness Guide
- 21 CFR 820 to ISO 13485 Mapping Guide (Including QMSR Harmonisation)
Spot something off? .