MRB · Nonconforming material · Disposition
MRB software from hold to documented disposition.
Hold nonconforming stock, gather the board's review and record the signed disposition against the affected lots.
Segregation at Detection
Receiving or in-process nonconformity tags the specific lot/serial, freezes it in the warehouse system, and opens the MRB record — no paper…
Quorum Board with Role Gating
QA, engineering, operations and (where required) regulatory sign the disposition; missing roles block closure.
Disposition Options, All Traceable
Use-as-is (with deviation and customer-notification link), rework (with revised routing and re-inspection), regrade (with new spec), return-to-vendor…
What goes wrong today3 common problems
Nonconforming Stock Sits in the Yellow-Tag Area
Waiting for the next MRB meeting — which is Thursday, and it's Monday, and the customer is waiting.
Disposition rationale is a paragraph in a spreadsheet
No linkage to the deviation, the CAPA or the customer notification obligation — auditor pulls the string and it comes out short.
Cost of poor quality is a guess
Scrap value, rework hours, expedited freight — never rolled up per supplier, per product family, per root cause.
Everything V5 does here5 capabilities
Segregation at Detection
Receiving or in-process nonconformity tags the specific lot/serial, freezes it in the warehouse system, and opens the MRB record — no paper travellers.
Quorum Board with Role Gating
QA, engineering, operations and (where required) regulatory sign the disposition; missing roles block closure. Async or scheduled sessions, both e-signed.
Disposition Options, All Traceable
Use-as-is (with deviation and customer-notification link), rework (with revised routing and re-inspection), regrade (with new spec), return-to-vendor (with SCAR), scrap (with write-off).
CAPA and Supplier Link
Recurring nonconformity auto-links to the parent CAPA and updates the supplier scorecard — the MRB record isn't a dead end.
Cost of Poor Quality Roll-Up
Scrap value + rework labour + expedited freight aggregated per supplier, product family and root cause — reported to management review without a spreadsheet.
How it works, step by step5 steps
MRB in V5.
- NC Raised. Receiving, in-process or supplier NC opens record.
- Warehouse Move Locked. Status change moves material to quarantine location.
- MRB Decides. Named disposition with required evidence.
- Action Performed. Rework/return/scrap executed with evidence.
- Supplier / CAPA / CoPQ. Scorecard, CAPA linkage and CoPQ recorded.
What to look for when choosing
MRB fails when nonconforming material sits in a queue and CoPQ isn't measured. Criteria below expose it.
Physical Segregation Link
Are quarantine locations tied to record status? Material status and warehouse location interlocked.
Disposition Workflow
Are Use-As-Is / Rework / Return / Scrap / UAI-with-concession dispositions distinct with evidence? Each disposition a distinct workflow with required evidence.
CoPQ Measurement
Is Cost of Poor Quality captured per event? CoPQ captured with financial linkage; trended per supplier / product / process.
Supplier NC Linkage
Do supplier NCs flow to supplier scorecards? Supplier NC hits scorecard automatically.
Concession Control
Are concessions time-limited, quantity-limited and re-evaluated? Concessions bounded and re-evaluated on expiry.
V5 Compared with Other Approaches
MRB approaches.
| capability | spreadsheet | legacy Qms | v5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical link | None | Cross-system | Interlocked |
| Disposition distinct | One field | Sometimes | Distinct workflows |
| CoPQ | Not captured | Optional | Native |
| Supplier scorecard | None | Cross-tool | Live |
Regulations this supportsYour quality team stays responsible for compliance
MRB clauses.
21 CFR 820.90
Distinct procedures per disposition with evidence.
ISO 13485 §8.3
Same platform serves 13485 §8.3.
ISO 9001 §8.7
Identification and control interlocked with warehouse.
Standards Referenced
- 21 CFR 211.87 (retesting of approved components)
- 21 CFR 211.89 (rejected components, drug product containers and closures)
- 21 CFR 820.90 (nonconforming product)
- ISO 9001:2015 §8.7 (control of nonconforming outputs)
- AS9100D §8.7 (control of nonconforming outputs — aerospace)
Common questions3 answers
- Can MRB run async or does it need a scheduled meeting?
- Both. Routine dispositions run async with role-gated e-signature; complex or safety-relevant cases can require a scheduled session with attendee capture.
- Does V5 stop the material physically or just electronically?
- Electronically at the warehouse system level — pick lists, shipments and next-operation moves refuse the lot until the MRB closes. Physical yellow-tag is still a good practice, V5 just doesn't rely on it.
- How does V5 prevent use-as-is dispositions from hiding a real problem?
- Repeat use-as-is on the same failure mode auto-escalates to CAPA and blocks further use-as-is until a corrective action is open — the pattern surfaces, it doesn't hide.
